It is the notarial document by means of which an agreement of wills is expressed where normally a banking entity makes available to a person a fixed amount of money that must be returned together with the interests by means of periodic payments in a determined time. The person who receives the money guarantees its return to the bank offering as guarantee a real estate property of his property.
Since the entry into force on June 16, 2019 of Law 5/2019 on Real Estate Credit Contracting, the controversy over who must assume the costs of formalizing the mortgage loan has been settled. The aforementioned Law establishes that the notary, registry, agency and tax expenses must be assumed by the financial entity. Through the following calculator it is offered to the financial entity to be able to know in advance with great accuracy the expenses of formalization of a mortgage loan. This calculator has parameterized both the notary and registry fees as well as the regional regulations in relation to the Stamp Duty tax.
Normally every mortgage loan contract, regardless of the financial entity chosen, presents the same structure divided into two large blocks: the financial clauses and the general non-financial clauses. In this section we answer all the possible doubts that may arise, following the order of the clauses that you will find in your future mortgage loan notarial deed.
The capital of the loan is the amount that the buyer of the house will have to request to the financial entity to, together with the own funds at his disposal, face the payment of the purchase price agreed in the real estate transaction, so that the capital of the loan is, in short, the amount of money that the financial entity is going to leave us so that we can pay the purchase price of the house that we wish to acquire.
The delivery of the capital for the acquisition of the property will take place on the same day on which the contract of sale of the property is executed, so that, almost simultaneously and consecutively, that is to say, at the same time, the buyer will sign the deed of sale and purchase and, immediately afterwards, formalize the mortgage loan deed in which this obligatory relationship between the mortgagor and the creditor financial institution will be reflected.
The day we acquire our property, as indicated above, we will first sign our deed of sale, using the funds that will have been paid to us that same day by the financial entity, normally by means of a bank check or by means of an immediate transfer via the Bank of Spain to the seller's designated bank account, to then sign the loan contract in which the assignment of capital, its conditions and repayment term are included.
Normally, financial institutions consider that a person or family unit can assume a monthly mortgage loan payment of between 30% and 40% of their net monthly disposable income.
Therefore, if we want to know what is our maximum capacity of indebtedness, we will have to add up all our monthly net income (for example, "a married couple in which both spouses earn 2,000 € net, have a total of 4,000 € monthly to face their family economy"). To this figure, we must apply the aforementioned percentages (30-40%), which, for example, in the case proposed, "yields a result of between €1,200 and €1,600", so that if the monthly payment of the loan that is sought is within these thresholds, the operation would be, a priori, viable, while, on the contrary, if the resulting payment, or the sum of this payment together with that of other previous debts exceeds these limits, the operation will hardly be approved by the financial institution.
Without prejudice to the specific particularities of each transaction, the general criterion of financial institutions is not to grant loans for an amount greater than 80% of the appraised value of the property (i.e., the value objectively assigned to the property by a company engaged in the appraisal or valuation of real estate, which must be contracted to perform this work) or, if applicable, 80% of the market value assigned to the property by the institution.
Therefore, in order to be eligible to purchase a property, the buyer must have at least 20% of the purchase price, while up to the remaining 80% will be covered by the loan requested.
Thus, by way of example, "if you intend to purchase an apartment whose sale value is 300,000 euros, if its appraisal value coincides with this amount, in order to be able to purchase it, you must have savings of at least 60,000 euros".
Will I have to pay taxes when I purchase my home?
It isnecessary to take into account that real estate purchase and sale transactions are subject to indirect taxes, that is, the Value Added Tax in the case of new construction or the Transfer Tax in the case of used housing. Broadly speaking, and without going into the details of the tax regulations, it is accepted common practice that the tax burden of a home purchase operation will amount to approximately 10% of its cost, so that if, for example, "I wish to purchase a property worth 300,000 euros, an additional 30,000 euros must be available to cover these taxes".
Do I have to pay any additional expenses to acquire my property?
Ifyou wish to properly formalize the purchase operation with the maximum guarantees and legal security, it will be necessary and appropriate to instrument the purchase of the property through a public deed authorized by a Notary Public, that is, a public official, professional of the Law, whose mission consists of attesting the acts and businesses that he/she authorizes and to watch over the legality of everything that is agreed in them. In addition, if it is desired to enjoy the protection that grants the registry publicity of our right in front of third parties, it will be necessary to register the deed of sale and purchase in the corresponding Land Registry.
Both operations, that is to say, both the granting of the deed and its inscription in the Land Registry, have a cost subject to a tariff fixed by the State, which, roughly speaking, can be between 1 and 2% of the cost of the operation, so that, for example, "if one wishes to acquire a house of 300.000€, it would suppose a total amount of between 3.000€ to 6.000€".
Thus, these amounts must be taken into account to know what is the maximum amount that my financial institution can lend me.
If we wish to acquire a house, beyond the capital that a financial entity can lend us, we will have to count on previous own funds of, approximately, 32% of the cost of sale of the property, to face, at least, 20% of the price with our savings (which is the minimum that the financial entity will demand from us), 10% of the operation, approximately, to pay the taxes that encumber it, as well as between 1 and 2% additional to cover the expenses of Notary and Registry of the Property.
Thus, by way of example, "if we wish to acquire a house whose sale price is 300,000 euros, that 32% would mean the amount of 96,000 euros; of which 20% will correspond to the part of the price that we will have to pay with our savings (60.000 in the example), 10% to pay the taxes of the operation (approximately 30.000€ in our example) and between 1 and 2% to pay the Notary and Land Registry fees (that is, in our example, a maximum amount of around 6.000€)".
In accordance with the regulations in force, for a mortgage to be validly constituted, it must be registered in the Property Registry, for which it will be necessary that the mortgage has been formalized in a public deed authorized by a Notary Public. Thus, effectively, in order to be able to have access to our loan with mortgage guarantee, it will be necessary to formalize the operation in a public deed and, a posteriori, to register the same one in the Registry of the Property.
In any case, all these formalities will usually be carried out by an agency or by the notary's office itself, without the buyer having to worry about carrying out all these bureaucratic acts.
The maturity periods of a loan are the terms available to the debtor to pay each of the monthly installments of the mortgage loan.
Thus, for example, on the first day of each month, if so agreed, the installment in question is due and the financial institution sends the amount of that installment to be charged to the mortgagor's account by means of the corresponding receipt.
A loan is a legal transaction in which one party, the lender, grants to the other, the borrower, a certain amount of capital, with the obligation for the borrower to return it within a certain period of time.
On this basis, and taking into account that the capital requested for the purchase of a home is usually very high (we are talking about figures that exceed hundreds of thousands of euros on many occasions), as is logical, the person or persons requesting it do not have the capacity to return it by means of a single payment, but the form of return consists of agreeing a high total repayment period (which may be, "for example, 15, 20, 25 or 30 years, or even longer periods of up to 40 years"), within which it is repaid gradually, normally with monthly payments, so that the debtor, month by month, repays the financial institution a certain amount, in accordance with his economic capacity ("for example, 600, 700 or 800 euros per month") until, once the entire life of the loan has elapsed, the entire capital initially requested when the loan was taken out has been returned.
In short, the loan installment is the amount that, month by month, the debtor must pay back to the financial institution, on a regular basis, the amount borrowed.
There is no optimal repayment term for all loans, but rather it varies according to the age of the borrowers, as well as their economic capacity.
On this basis, loans with a very long repayment term, such as 40 years, have the advantage that the monthly payment to be made by the borrower will be lower. On the other hand, on the negative side, the amount that will finally have to be paid to the financial institution will be much higher and, also, in the event that the agreed interest rate is a variable rate, the debtor will be much more exposed to interest rate variations, so that slight rises in the interest rate will imply significant increases in his monthly payment. In these assumptions, a long repayment term is usually more interesting for young people, with not very high incomes at the present time, since the resulting quota will be smaller and they will be able to pay it in a much more comfortable way.
On the other hand, if a short repayment term is chosen ("for example, 10 or 15 years"), the monthly installments to be paid back to the Bank or Savings Bank will be much higher, but the interest rate risk is much lower, so that interest rate increases will not have such a severe impact on the amount of the installment. In this case, this shorter repayment period is usually more advisable for people of an older age ("for example, 40 or 50 years old") or with a greater economic capacity.
The amortization of a loan consists of the return of the borrowed capital, that is to say, to return to the Bank or Savings Bank the amount of money that it has lent us.
Ordinarily, this repayment will be made in periodic installments (usually monthly) or, if the debtor so wishes and has the funds to do so, by means of a total or partial early cancellation of the existing debt.
Of the total amount of the monthly payment of your loan, part of it is used to repay the capital requested, while the remaining part will be used to satisfy the interest agreed in the operation, that is, the price or benefit obtained by the entity with the operation.
Thus, "for example, if a mortgagor pays a monthly payment of €500, of that amount, €400 will be used to repay the capital loaned or principal, while €100 will be used to pay the agreed interest".
The determination of the specific amount of the periodic installment of our loan (whose most common periodicity is monthly) will be determined by the so-called "amortization system", that is to say, the mathematical-financial formula agreed between the parties to calculate the amount of capital and interest to be returned in each monthly installment.
Of all the existing amortization systems, the most common is the so-called French or constant installment system, whose most relevant characteristic is that the amount of the monthly installment will remain unchanged throughout the life of the loan, provided that the applicable interest rate is the same.
Thus, by way of example, "in a mortgage whose method of amortization is French and in which a fixed interest rate has been agreed, if the initial payment is 700 euros per month, this is the amount that the debtor will invariably pay each month during the 20, 30 or even 40 years of the life of the loan that have been agreed, until the total repayment of the amount requested has been reached".
Also, as an additional characteristic, in this system, the amount of interest and capital that is amortized is inversely proportional, so that, at the beginning of the life of the loan, of the total installment that is paid, the interest represents a greater part, which decreases as the installments are paid, while the portion of capital that is returned behaves in the opposite way, since in the initial installments it represents a smaller portion, which increases as the life of the loan progresses.
Thus, by way of example, "for a loan of €10,000, with a repayment period of 12 months and an interest rate of 5%, your amortization table will be as follows:
As can be seen, the installment that is paid is always constant (€855.57), but of this amount, at the beginning of the loan, the amount of interest paid is greater than the amount paid for this concept in the final installments, which happens the other way around with the returned capital, which is lower in the initial installments than in the final ones".
Beyond the French or constant installment system, there are other types of amortization systems that use a different mathematical-financial formula to calculate the form and amount of the installments with which the requested loan will be repaid. Among all the existing ones, the following can be highlighted:
The amortization table of a mortgage loan is a document in which all the payments that the debtor will have to make throughout the life of the loan are collected, so that before signing our loan, we will know how many installments we will pay, of what amount, what amount of principal and interest each installment includes and what is the amortized capital and the outstanding capital, at each moment.
This amortization table is a document that must be provided by the financial entity in the negotiation process of our loan, as the law requires it to be part of the pre-contractual information of the operation to be included in the so-called European Standardized Information Sheet (known as FEIN). With this, the protection of the mortgage consumer is guaranteed, since he is perfectly informed of how his loan is going to behave throughout its life cycle.
Of course, the mortgagor can amortize his mortgage whenever he wishes, so that if he has sufficient funds to do so, at any time he can decide to advance the payment of the existing debt, in order to reduce, or even to end completely with the contracted debt, that is to say, to amortize partially or totally his mortgage loan.
In case of opting for a partial amortization, that is to say, of only a part of the loan, as a result of the same the debtor will be able to choose between:
Usually, the contracting parties to a mortgage usually agree on fees to compensate the financial institutions in the event of early repayment, in whole or in part, of their loan.
However, it is necessary to point out that, in order to avoid very high commissions that may represent a situation of abuse or disproportion in relation to consumers, the legislator has limited their amount in Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating real estate credit contracts. For more information on this matter, please refer to the "commissions" section.
The grace period is a period of time in which the debtor only pays a small amount, corresponding to the interest on the loan, while amortizing capital during this period, so that the debt owed to the bank is not reduced.
In practice, grace periods are usually applied at the beginning of the life of the loan, for a period of a few months to a maximum of two years. Thus, for example, "in the event that a monthly payment of 500 euros is agreed, of which 400 euros correspond to the repayment of the capital and 100 euros to the interest remuneration, during the agreed grace period (which is usually from one to two years), the debtor will only have to pay the part corresponding to the interest, that is, 100 euros per month".
The majority of people, when facing the great decision of acquiring a house to build their home, which, in many occasions, will be their residence for the rest of their life, must make a huge economic effort to be able to obtain the necessary own funds for such acquisition. Thus, in order to be able to buy a home by taking out a mortgage loan, it is necessary to have available ex ante at least 32% of the purchase price, a very high percentage considering the current average cost of housing and the purchasing power of an average citizen (so, "for example, in a property whose price is 250,000 euros, we would be talking about having previously saved the amount of 80,000 euros").
Taking into account this reality, together with the set of additional expenses that we will have to face when we start our new life in the purchased property (taxes, cost of utilities, furniture, household furnishings, etc.), and all of this combined with the cost of the property, we will have to pay the additional expenses that we will have to face when we start our new life in the purchased property.), and all this combined with the fact that when a home is purchased, in many occasions its buyers are young people whose salaries are not very high (but who have expectations of increasing them over time), determines that in many occasions, to satisfy from the first moment a high quota of the mortgage loan supposes a great economic effort for the families, which can lead them to a strained financial situation.
In order to alleviate these cases, that is to say, those cases in which during the first months of the life of the loan, the debtor presents a more complex economic situation, the financial entities and the debtors can agree to resort to the instrument of the grace period, that is to say, the application of a period in which during the same, the debtor will not pay the totality of the "ordinary" installment, but will only pay a small amount corresponding to the agreed interest.
By resorting to this instrument, the debtor can lighten his financial situation in that initial stage of the loan, in which perhaps his salary is lower (since he is younger, has less work experience and his salary is not so high) or the expenses of the start-up of the property may be a strain on his domestic economy, with which, it is possible to overcome this situation and to postpone the repayment of the principal to a future moment (one or two years later), in which presumably the debtor will present a more favorable economic situation to face the totality of the quota, that is to say, "the 500 Euros per month of the proposed example".
If the mortgagor, once the life of the loan has begun, is experiencing economic difficulties, so that it is very difficult, or even impossible, to pay the monthly installment of his loan, he can try to negotiate with his financial institution a grace period, so that during this period he only pays interest and not principal, which will significantly reduce the amount to be paid each month to the creditor, which will undoubtedly help to alleviate the family finances during this period of difficulty.
With this, from a negative point of view, the life of the loan will be extended, that is to say, the debtor will have to pay more years, but from a positive point of view, it will be possible to avoid a situation of non-payment that can degenerate in a foreclosure procedure that, for sure, will end in the loss of the property of the real estate.
The interest rate is the remuneration or consideration received by the lending financial institution in exchange for granting the loan in question, i.e., the income generated by the financial institution through its activity of lending money.
With this money, the Bank or Savings Bank in turn pays the cost of obtaining this capital, covers its operating expenses and, if there is still a surplus, generates a capital gain with which it pays back its shareholders or generates reserves to increase its solvency or capacity to grant new loans in the future.
The interest rate to be applied to my mortgage loan will be the one agreed between debtor and creditor in the loan contract.
That said, with regard to the existing options, it can be stated that, broadly speaking, there are two types of interest rate to be applied in a mortgage loan, namely:
Fixed-rate mortgages are those in which the parties agree on an interest rate that will be applied throughout the term of the contract. Thus, "byway of example, if in a mortgage a fixed interest rate of 2% is agreed upon, it will be that percentage that will be applied during the entire term of the loan".
On the other hand, variable interest rate mortgages are those in which the interest rate paid to the financial entity varies according to the fluctuation of the reference index chosen. Thus, "for example, if the EURIBOR is agreed as the reference interest rate, this fluctuates daily, so that, if initially 1% was applicable, when the review period arrives, if the EURIBOR has risen to 2%, this new percentage will be applied as the ordinary interest rate of the loan".
In the case of variable rate mortgages, this interest rate, which, as its name indicates, varies over time, varies according to the so-called reference index, i.e., an indicator that aggregates a set of specific data that varies over time ("such as the average cost at which financial institutions exchange money") and on the basis of which the evolution of the interest rate of the loan is fixed.
Thus, if this reference index increases, the variable interest rate of the loan will also increase, while if the reference index falls, so will the interest rate applicable to the transaction.
The reference index applied to most variable interest mortgages is the EURIBOR (acronym of Euro Interbank Offered Rate), which is a reference index formed by the average interest rate at which financial institutions in the Euro Zone lend money to each other in the short term in order to, in turn, lend it to third parties.
This index, which is published daily and for various periods (annual, 9 months, 6 months, 3 months, etc.), fluctuates according to the supply and demand for credit at any given time, a magnitude closely linked to the economic cycle and the monetary policy implemented at any given time by the European Central Bank.
In addition to the EURIBOR, there are other reference indexes in force, such as the MIBOR, the IRS or the IRPH for all entities, all of which are rarely used at present.
Broadly speaking, we can state that the evolution of the reference index that will determine the cost of our mortgage referenced to a variable interest rate will be determined by the evolution of the economic cycle. Normally, in periods of economic prosperity, the Central Banks, through their monetary policy instruments, tend to raise interest rates to prevent inflation from increasing excessively, thus preventing assets from depreciating. Thus, if interest rates rise, borrowing money becomes more expensive, so that consumption and investment suffer, which cools down the "overheated" economy that is growing too fast, causing inflation to rise.
On the other hand, in times of economic crisis, Central Banks usually adopt monetary expansion measures, such as providing liquidity to financial institutions at a very low cost, in order to lower interest rates and make it more attractive to borrow money to make investments, purchase real estate, etc., and thus reactivate the economy.
In addition, the evolution of the indexes can also be influenced by other factors, such as the perception of risk by financial institutions, so that if they perceive a future scenario of economic uncertainty, they can foresee an increase in delinquency and, therefore, in risk, which pushes them to increase the interest rates at which they lend money to cover these eventual defaults, with which the reference indexes are also under upward pressure.
In variable rate mortgages, an additional percentage, also agreed between the parties, will be added to the agreed reference rate to cover the financial margin of the borrowing bank or savings bank. Thus, the difference between the interest rate finally applied and the reference rate becomes the agreed spread.
"Byway of example, if a spread of 0.9% is agreed, and the EURIBOR is currently at 1%, the interest rate applicable to the loan would be 1.9%".
The variable interest of my mortgage will be determined by the reference index that is agreed (which will be subject to the evolution that it presents over time), to which the differential will have to be added, that is, the surcharge demanded by the financial institution to cover its margin.
Thus, "byway of example, if the application of the EURIBOR is agreed, and this is situated at 1%, and additionally a differential of 0.9% is agreed, the interest rate applicable to the loan would be 1.9%".
In variable interest mortgages it may happen that the evolution of the reference index, together with the agreed differential, yields a figure with several decimals, which may conflict with the agreement that the interest rate will be revised at intervals. ("for example, if the applicable interest rate is 1.8001 , and a variable interest rate has been agreed in intervals of a quarter of a point [from 0.25 to 0.25], it is necessary to determine whether the applicable interest rate is 1.75% or 2%, with the obvious economic consequences for the debtor").
In order to avoid excesses by financial institutions that have occurred in the past, the legislator limited this practice by means of the twelfth additional provision of Law 44/2002, of November 22, 2002, on Financial System Reform Measures, limiting rounding to the nearest agreed interval, without exceeding one eighth of a point, i.e. (0.125%).
("Thus, in the proposed example, the interest rate would be set at 1.75%, since it is the closest amount to 1.8001, between the two options [i.e., let us remember, 1.75% or 2%]").
In addition to the agreed reference rate and the agreed spread, we must take into account the existence of possible floor or cap clauses, which limit the applicable interest rate at the lower or upper end, so that if the reference rate, together with the spread, exceeds or falls below a certain threshold, the excess will not be applied to the interest rate.
Thus, "byway of example, if a ceiling clause of 5% is agreed, if the reference index exceeds that amount, the excess will not be taken into account, so that only 5% interest will be paid. On the other hand, if a 1% loose clause is agreed, if the reference index falls below that level, the agreed 1% would continue to be applied".
In relation to the floor clauses, it is necessary to note that the same, after the abundant litigation that have presented in recent years, the result of the lack of transparency in its marketing, have been limited by the recent Law 5/2019, regulating real estate credit contracts (art. 21) but it must also be taken into account that this same precept establishes that the remunerative interest of the operation may not be less than 0, so that through this legal provision, a floor clause is established at 0%, so that in no case may the interest of the operation be negative, since this would mean that the financial institution has to pay interest to the debtor, a completely implausible situation.
The interest rate applicable to the loan, if it is variable, will not vary month by month according to the agreed reference index, but the usual practice is to fix a specific moment in which, periodically, the amount of the reference index at that moment is verified and, based on that figure, the interest rate to be applied during the following period is determined.
Thus, the most common review period is usually annual, so that, once a year, the value of the reference index will be taken as a reference, and the amount to be paid to the financial institution during the following year will be updated on the basis of this value.
The evolution of the benchmark indexes is published both in the Official State Gazette and on the Bank of Spain's website.
Although it is not a common practice, if so agreed, it would indeed be possible to apply a mixed interest rate to our mortgage loan, that is, a combination of a fixed and a variable interest rate.
In these cases, in the first period of the life of the loan (the 2, 3, 4 or 5 years of the loan) the fixed interest rate is usually applied, in order to give stability to the initial payment, while during the rest of the duration of the loan a previously agreed variable interest rate would be applied.
The answer to this question can only be negative, so that the Bank or Savings Bank cannot unilaterally modify the interest rate previously agreed with its client, since otherwise it would incur in a flagrant banking malpractice perfectly denounceable before the regulator.
The answer to this question can only be negative, so that the Bank or Savings Bank cannot unilaterally apply a differential different from the one previously agreed with its client, otherwise it would incur in a flagrant banking malpractice perfectly denounceable before the regulator.
The total amount of interest that we will finally pay to our bank for the mortgage loan that we contract is a figure that will vary depending on the capital loaned, the repayment term and the interest rate applied, which makes each particular case a different case.
That said, it is no less true that nowadays, after the entry into force of the Real Estate Credit Law (Law 5/2019), in order to contract the loan in question, it is necessary that the financial entity has previously provided us with a series of pre-contractual information, all of which is contained in a document called FEIN. This document must contain an "illustrative repayment table" in which the customer is shown the total amount of the installments to be paid, with the corresponding breakdown between capital and interest in each one of them.
Based on this information, if the loan requested is at a fixed rate, we will be able to know in advance exactly what total amount of interest we will have to disburse throughout the loan. On the contrary, if the type of loan is referenced to a variable interest rate, this table can show us an approximation of this amount taking into account the current interest rate, but always with the proviso that if this interest rate undergoes notable variations throughout the life of the loan, this amount will also be ostensibly modified.
Undoubtedly, this is the big question that all buyers, when they decide to resort to a mortgage loan, ask themselves. In relation to this question, it is necessary to point out that there is no single answer, since depending on the type of buyer, our previous assets or savings, our aversion to risk, our present and future income, or the current or structural situation of our economy, the answer will vary in one direction or another.
Thus, fixed-rate mortgages, i.e., those in which we will always pay the same interest rate and, therefore, the same installment, are intended for more conservative people, with a greater aversion to risk, since knowing exactly what installment we must face each month for the next 20, 25 or 30 years, undoubtedly provides a degree of certainty that helps to plan our financial economy.
From a pricing point of view, it is not possible to affirm that the fixed rate mortgage is better than the variable rate mortgage, because although it is true that, at the time of contracting it, its amount will be higher than the variable rate, it may happen that throughout the life of the loan macroeconomic events occur that raise the variable interest rate much higher than the agreed fixed rate ("so, for example, take into account the fact that the interest rate is higher than the fixed rate,for example, bear in mind that a fixed-rate mortgage today, which could be agreed at 2.5%, would be a great deal if interest rates were to rise to the levels reached in the 1980s, when they exceeded 15%").
On the other hand, as negative aspects of fixed-rate mortgages, we can highlight the following:
As main advantages of the variable mortgages, we can highlight the fact that their initial payments will be lower than those that would correspond if the fixed interest rate were chosen, although a posteriori, their amount will be at the mercy of the evolution of the agreed reference index.
Likewise, if the buyer considers that during the term of the loan the interest rates will remain at a reduced level, and this is indeed the case, the operation will be more profitable, since less interest will be paid than if the fixed rate had been chosen. On the other hand, if some macroeconomic externality were to occur that raises the interest rates notably, the quota of our loan could also experience very notable increases, so that the operation will not be satisfactory for the buyer, in relation to a hypothetical loan at a fixed rate.
Additionally, as a positive aspect, it is necessary to indicate that the variable rate mortgages can have a longer repayment term (up to 40 years according to the usual banking practice), which also contributes to reduce the amount of your monthly payment, since the repayment of the outstanding capital is accrued over a longer period. On the other hand, as a negative aspect of this longer extension, it should be noted that this will mean higher interest charges, as the debt remains outstanding for longer.
This is an agreement between the mortgaged debtor and the creditor financial entity, by virtue of which, in exchange for contracting a series of additional products (such as insurance contracts, pension plans, direct deposit of payroll, contracting credit cards, home security alarms, etc.) the initially agreed interest rate will be reduced in favor of the debtor.
The answer to this question must be negative, in the sense that it is currently strictly forbidden to market, together with a loan, other products in a sort of "single and indivisible pack".
In order to properly understand this issue, it is necessary to take into account that, unfortunately, in recent years, financial institutions, in order to generate more profits, have linked the granting of loans to the contracting of additional products (such as insurance, pension plans, investment funds, direct deposit of payrolls, credit card registrations, security alarms, cell phone financing, etc.), so that if the mortgagor did not contract these products, the financial institution would refuse the operation.
In view of this banking malpractice, the regulator, in the recent Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating Real Estate Credit contracts, has put a stop to it, establishing a strict regulation on these practices.
Thus, at present, the linked sale of banking products in the contracting of a loan, i.e., the offering of a joint package consisting of the loan and other additional products, offered together, is completely prohibited, under penalty of nullity of any contract linked to the loan in question.
Starting from a general prohibition of linked or joint sales, the legislator establishes a series of exceptions of which the consumer should be aware, as described below:
Together with the loan guaranteed by mortgage, there are two products whose contracting will be obligatory, that is, a life insurance (to guarantee the fulfillment of the contracted obligation in case of death of the debtor), as well as a damage insurance with respect to the mortgaged property (to ensure that, if the property that serves as guarantee of the loan suffers any damage, it can be repaired).
In any case, the compulsory contracting of these two products should not be carried out invariably with the financial entity that grants the loan, since if we find a similar product with better economic and coverage conditions in a competing company, we can contract this one to the detriment of the insurance offered by our bank, which had worse conditions.
The combined sale, as opposed to the linked sale, is the sale of additional products (pension plans, direct deposit of payroll, contracting of cards, etc.) is carried out separately, so that the debtor receives an individualized offer detailing the separate conditions of each product, so that he can evaluate them individually and decide, if necessary, whether it is convenient or not to contract them.
If the financial entity offers us an interest rate rebate agreement in the case of contracting a certain financial product or service, we will obviously have to evaluate this offer and determine whether the interest rate reduction is sufficiently attractive or not.
Likewise, from an operational point of view, contracting all our financial and insurance products and services with the same company simplifies the administrative procedures that we must carry out, and also strengthens our future negotiating power with the entity, since if we have many products contracted, given the risk of losing us as customers in the future (which would have a strong impact on their margin), it is possible that they will offer us better conditions for subsequent contracts.
On the negative side, if we contract all our products with the same entity, we may be renouncing more aggressive offers from competing companies that could offer us a better price or better service conditions.
A bank commission is the consideration (in the form of a percentage or a specific amount) that the financial institution will charge us for providing us with a service or a specific financial product.
Of course, it is legal, normal and natural for a bank or savings bank to charge fees to its customers for the financial products or services it provides.
However, in order to avoid bad banking practices, so that customers have to pay very high commissions, the charging of commissions is highly regulated by the legislator and by the banking supervisor, so that in most cases, financial institutions cannot apply the prices or percentages they want, but are constrained by a series of limitations established in the applicable regulations.
In this sense, see for example Order EHA/2899/2011, which establishes that "commissions may only be charged or expenses charged for services firmly requested or expressly accepted by a customer", as well as that "commissions may only be charged (by financial institutions) provided that they correspond to services actually rendered".
Broadly speaking, and by way of summary, a bank may charge the following fees over the life of the loan:
The origination fee, also known as a study fee, is the fee charged by the financial institution to the debtor when the loan is granted, for all the administrative and management expenses derived from the formalization of the credit operation, such as the expenses generated in the collection of preparatory documentation for the loan, the analysis of the client's solvency, the preparation of the loan contract, etc.
Thus, it is common to find this type of commissions in some mortgage loans, which may be presented as a specific amount ("for example, €1000") or as a percentage of the operation ("this is, for example, 0.5% of the amount of the loan granted").
The opening or study commission has generated some litigation in the courts, although the courts have opted to declare its lawfulness (see in this regard the Supreme Court ruling 44/2019 of January 23), provided that it corresponds to expenses actually incurred by the financial institution and is not manifestly disproportionate.
That said, from a legislative point of view, the current regulations do not establish a maximum limit to its amount. However, the recent Law 5/2019 of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit contracts establishes that, in the event that an arrangement fee is agreed, it shall be accrued only once and shall include all the expenses of study, processing or granting of the loan or other expenses inherent to the lender's activity caused by the granting of the loan.
This is a commission that the financial institution charges its customers in the event that they do not pay the monthly installment of their loan within the established term, if as a result of this situation the bank or savings bank must take effective steps to obtain the collection of the unpaid installment. Thus, this commission serves to compensate the entity for the administrative expenses (calls from telephone agents, claims via email or mail, etc.) that this management of the claim of the unpaid payment generates.
In accordance with the Bank of Spain's regulations, the fee for claiming unpaid debts will be legal, as long as it is not charged automatically upon default, but only if, as a result of such default, the financial institution has had to take administrative steps to claim and obtain the delayed payment, in which case, in order to compensate for these expenses, the fee may be charged. Likewise, and in such a case, the Bank of Spain considers that it can only be charged on one occasion.
That said, it is also necessary to point out that in the jurisdictional sphere there are court rulings that annul this kind of commissions for considering them abusive (Judgment of the Provincial Court of Cáceres 907/2017, of November 15) or others in which it has been considered that the same constitutes a double penalty that is added to the late payment interest, which is also improper (judgment of the Provincial Court of Álava 739/2016, of December 30).
Finally, after the entry into force of Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating real estate credit contracts, it is necessary to refer to the FIAE, which is a document that the financial entity must deliver to the debtor with the detail of all the characteristics and costs of the operation, This document must include the causes that can generate an early maturity of the loan (such as non-payment) as well as the expenses derived from it, in which it can be interpreted that this commission could be included, so that in order for it to be charged, it would be necessary for it to have been expressly specified in this document.
This is a commission that the financial entity may charge its customers in the event that they decide to repay the outstanding capital in advance, either totally or partially, so that if, before maturity, the debtor decides that he does not want to continue owing that money, and therefore repays all or part of it and cancels all or part of the debt, in such a case, the financial entity may charge a commission, if a series of legal requirements are effectively met.
On the assumption that it is indeed possible to charge this type of commission, it should be known that, given its potentially high amount, it has been subject to detailed and detailed regulation by the legislator, so that only if the legal requirements are met will it be possible for the Bank or Savings Bank to charge this commission.
Thus, its amount and limits will depend on the moment in which the mortgage loan was constituted, since depending on the regulations in force at that time, its amount and limits vary.
Taking as a reference the regulations in force, applicable to the mortgages that are constituted at the present time, determined by Law 5/2019, of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit contracts, the commission that the bank may charge us will be the following:
1.- For loans at variable interest rates, a commission for early repayment may be established contractually in one of the two modalities that will be set out below (which will be mutually exclusive):
2.- For fixed interest rate loans, an early repayment fee may be contractually established with the following limits:
The novation or modification fee is the fee that may be charged by a financial institution in the event that it agrees with its debtor client a modification of the loan conditions, and this modification may affect aspects as diverse as the capital (it may refer, for example, to a capital increase), a modification of the payment term, a variation of the agreed interest rate, a modification of the guarantees of the transaction or even of the amortization method applicable to the transaction.
Of course, this is possible and legal, as long as this commission and its possible amounts have been previously agreed in the loan contract, and all the requirements of transparency and non-abusiveness of the contractual clause in question are met.
If the novation or modification of the loan refers, specifically, to the applicable interest rate, it is necessary to take into account that Law 5/2019, of March 15, establishes a series of limitations to its collection, namely:
This is the fee that may be charged by the financial entity that initially granted the loan if, a posteriori, we decide to change bank or savings bank and transfer our loan to another entity that offers us better conditions (whether in terms of interest rate, repayment term, capital granted, etc.).
Pursuant to Article 3 of Law 2/1994, in mortgage loan subrogations due to a change of creditor, if the mortgage loan is referenced to a variable rate, the following fees may be charged:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is necessary to take into account that if the subrogation of the creditor implies the substitution of a variable rate for a fixed rate for the remainder of the term of the loan, the legislator has established a special rule, which is as follows:
The mortgage cancellation fee is a fee that, in the past, some financial institutions have charged their customers for issuing a zero balance certificate, that is, a document certifying that the debt is already paid off and that, therefore, the lifting of the charge is consented to or, if applicable, for sending a representative of the institution to sign the mortgage cancellation deed at the corresponding notary's office.
Currently, the banking regulator (see the 2016 Report of the Bank of Spain's Claims Service) considers it bad banking practice to charge for this certificate or for the travel of the entity's representative to sign the deed of cancellation.
A different matter is that, if we wish, the financial entity will offer us the services of an agency to manage the lifting of the registration of the mortgage charge, taking care that this deed is granted as well as its corresponding registration in the Land Registry. In such a case, if as clients we accept the offer that is made to us, of course there will be no problem in that the financial entity will charge us the agreed price for these services.
The table of payments, or amortization of a mortgage loan, is a document in which all the payments that the debtor must make throughout the life of the loan are collected, so that before signing our loan, we will know how many installments we will pay, of what amount, what amount of principal and interest each installment includes and what is the amortized capital and the outstanding capital, at each moment.
This amortization table is a document that must be provided by the financial entity during the negotiation process of our loan, as the law requires it to be part of the pre-contractual information of the operation to be included in the so-called European Standardized Information Sheet (known as FEIN). With this, the protection of the mortgage consumer is guaranteed, since he is perfectly informed of how his loan is going to behave throughout its life cycle.
The following is a simulation of a repayment schedule for a loan of 10,000 euros, with a repayment period of 12 months, and an interest rate of 5%:
The amount of each monthly installment of my loan will be determined by the mathematical formula corresponding to the amortization system that has been agreed upon, to which the requested capital, the agreed interest rate and the agreed repayment terms must be applied.
The nominal interest rate, also known by the acronym TIN, is the interest rate that the debtor of the loan will pay to the financial institution, which will be determined by a specific percentage if the mortgage loan has been agreed at a fixed rate, while, if it has been referenced to a variable rate, it will be determined by the current amount of the reference index plus the differential that has been agreed.
"Thus, by way of example, if a fixed rate of 2.5% has been agreed, the NIR of the transaction is that 2.5%, whereas if the agreed interest rate were variable, referenced to the EURIBOR (which at that time was quoted at 1%), plus a differential of half a point, the NIR of the transaction, at that time, would be 1.5%".
The Annual Percentage Rate, also known by its acronym APR, is a financial mathematical formula that allows us to know the real cost of a credit operation, taking into account the periodicity of payment of its installments, as well as the other commissions and expenses that the operation may entail, beyond the nominal interest (or TIN) of the same.
Thus, the APR is the reference value that we should use to assess the real cost of our loan.
The calculation of the APR is obtained through a financial mathematical formula that takes into account the capital requested, the nominal interest rate, the repayment term and the frequency of payment of the installments (annual, quarterly, monthly), as well as the additional expenses and commissions of our loan.
The APR of our credit operation must be provided by the financial entity, both in the pre-contractual documentation of the loan and in the loan contract itself.
However, if we want to check the APR of our transaction, the banking regulator (i.e. the Bank of Spain) provides us with an online calculator where we can obtain the APR of our loan(click here).
If the TIN expresses, in a simple way, the nominal interest rate applicable to the operation, the APR is a more complex value (to obtain it we must apply a mathematical formula) that takes into account additional variables beyond the interest rate, such as the repayment term, the frequency of payments, as well as other costs and commissions of the operation.
Thus, the APR is an indicator that shows us more reliably and adequately the real cost of the operation, and allows us to adequately compare different loan options with different durations, interest rates or additional conditions (costs and commissions).
Therefore, the consumer should take as a reference the APR of the operation to adequately assess whether the offer received is adequate or not, as well as its possible comparison with other options that may be offered by other financial institutions, in order to choose the one that best suits him/her.
With the acquisition of our home, beyond the purchase price and the taxes applicable to that purchase price, if we resort to the financing of a financial institution, the latter, in order to have a greater guarantee in relation to the risk taken when granting us money on credit, will undoubtedly require the constitution of a mortgage on the acquired property, that is to say, a real right of guarantee that, in case of nonpayment of the granted loan, confers the faculty to urge the forced sale of the property, in order to obtain the necessary funds to pay off the unpaid debt and the interests that have been generated.
Thus the things, to the loan that we request, it will accompany the constitution of a real right of mortgage, which will generate a series of additional expenses, that next they try to be detailed:
At present, and in accordance with Law 5/2019 of 15 March, regulating real estate credit contracts (art. 14), if said regulation is applicable, which will be the case if the debtor is a natural person, the creditor is a professional, and the property to be acquired is intended for residential use, the costs of the appraisal of the property will be borne by the borrower, i.e. the debtor who is mortgaged.
Thus, it will be the buyer of the property who requests the loan who will have to pay the appraiser of the property his fees.
At present, and in accordance with Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating real estate credit contracts (art. 14), if said rule is applicable, which will happen if the debtor is a natural person, the creditor is a professional, and the property to be acquired is intended for residential use, the notary fee for the deed of the loan with mortgage guarantee, as well as the copies of the same that are requested, will be charged to the lender, that is, the Bank or Savings Bank that lends us the money to acquire the property.
In relation to this, it is necessary to indicate that this has been a very controversial issue in the past that has generated a lot of litigation in the courts, because until not long ago the financial entities always passed this cost on to the debtor.
At present, in order to limit this practice, as has been indicated, the cost is assumed by the lending financial entity, since in reality it is the interested party in the registration of the mortgage in the Property Registry, since it is a guarantee in its favor in the event of non-payment.
In accordance with the current wording of art. 29 of the Law on Transfer Tax and Stamp Duty (operated by Royal Decree-Law 17/2018), "in the case of deeds of loan with mortgage guarantee, the lender will be considered the taxable person".
Thus, it will be the financial entity that will assume the tax burden of the Stamp Duty generated by the deed of loan with mortgage guarantee.
This is a question to which no single answer can be given, since in accordance with Law 22/2009, of December 18, 2009, this tax is a tax assigned to the Autonomous Communities, so that depending on the specific regulations of each territory, the amount of this tax will vary.
At present, and in accordance with Law 5/2019 of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit contracts (art. 14), if said regulation is applicable, which will be the case if the debtor is a natural person, the creditor is a professional, and the property to be acquired is intended for residential use, the costs of registration of the guarantees in the Land Registry will correspond to the lender, that is, to the creditor financial entity that lends us the money.
At present, and in accordance with Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating real estate credit contracts (art. 14), if said regulation is applicable, which will be the case if the debtor is a natural person, the creditor is a professional, and the property to be acquired is intended for residential use, the fees of the agency that processes and coordinates the entire granting process, the settlement of taxes and the registration of the deed, will correspond to the lender, that is, to the creditor financial entity that lends us the money.
Indeed, the acquisition of a property has a fiscal cost, since it is subject to taxation. In the case of new construction, the buyer must pay Value Added Tax (known as VAT), while in the case of used homes, the applicable tax is the Transfer Tax.
As regards the specific amount to be paid, this may vary depending on the many variables contained in the complex tax regulations. However, in general terms, it is estimated that, approximately, the tax burden of the purchase of a home is usually around 10% of the purchase price.
Once the life of the loan is over, once all the money has been returned, it is necessary to carry out an additional procedure, that is, the cancellation of the mortgage charge in the Property Registry, because, although the loan is already paid, in the Registry it will continue to be recorded that the property is encumbered with a mortgage, which, for example, can make its sale difficult.
Therefore, in this case, the procedure of granting the deed of cancellation of the mortgage and its inscription in the Property Registry will correspond to the owner of the property, who will have to carry out this procedure once he has returned all the money of the loan and this has been extinguished.
In any case, if the owner does not wish to carry out these procedures, he/she can hire an agency to carry them out on his/her behalf, upon payment of the agreed fees.
This is no longer the case. In the past (home purchases prior to January 1, 2013), the amounts paid in the mortgage installment enjoyed a deduction for investment in primary residence in the Personal Income Tax Law (IRPF). However, at present this is no longer the case, so that the purchase of a home has no tax benefits to highlight at this time.
In the past, in the absence of an express rule regulating this matter, financial institutions passed on the entire cost of the mortgage transaction to the debtor, i.e., agency, notary and land registry fees.
Faced with this situation, many debtors took this practice to court, to the point that the matter was resolved by the Supreme Court in a judgment of January 23, 2019, in which it was established that the notary and agency fees should be paid 50% by the debtor and the financial institution, while the costs of registration in the Land Registry should be paid exclusively by the lender.
Thus, if you, in the past, took out a mortgage and assumed all the expenses, you can go to court to try to recover the amount corresponding to these concepts that you were not responsible for paying. In any case, as far as the viability of this process, its terms and costs are concerned, it is highly recommended to turn to a lawyer who can properly advise the interested party in bringing this legal action.
The interests of delay, or also known as moratorium interests, are those interests that the debtor has to pay to the mortgage creditor in case of a nonpayment of one or several installments of the loan.
Thus, the interests of delay are constituted in a sort of penalty or compensation that the debtor must satisfy to the Bank or Savings Bank to compensate him for the losses and damages that generates to him that nonpayment of the debt.
Pursuant to Article 25 of Law 5/2019 of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit agreements, when such rule is applicable (i.e., for credits entered into between a consumer, as debtor, and a professional, as creditor, for the purchase of residential housing), the interest for late payment may not exceed by 3 percentage points the interest on the loan that has been agreed.
"Thus, byway of example, if a fixed rate of 2.5% has been agreed, the interest for late payment applicable to the loan may not exceed 5.5%".
Pursuant to Article 25 of Law 5/2019 of March 15, 2019, regulating real estate credit contracts, when this rule is applicable (i.e. for credits concluded between a consumer, as debtor, and a professional, as creditor, for the purchase of residential housing), the interest for late payment shall be calculated on the principal outstanding and overdue, i.e. on the unpaid debt.
"Thus, for example, if 3 installments of €1,000 each are owed, the late payment interest will be applied on those €3,000".
Likewise, the aforementioned regulation establishes that this late payment interest cannot be capitalized, so that late payment interest cannot be charged on the late payment interest already generated, which protects the debtor and avoids incurring in the so-called anatocism, which would significantly increase the debt of the individual with the financial entity.
The answer to this question must be in the negative, since in accordance with Article 25 of Law 5/2019 of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit agreements, when this rule is applicable (i.e., for loans entered into between a consumer, as debtor, and a professional, as creditor), the limits on interest for late payment (i.e., as a maximum of three percentage points higher than the interest rate on the loan) do not allow any agreement to the contrary, for the purchase of residential housing), the limits to the interest for late payment (i.e., a maximum of three percentage points higher than the remunerative interest of the loan) do not admit any agreement to the contrary, so that if a higher interest rate is agreed or the financial entity imposes a clause with a higher percentage, the same would be null and void.
If indeed the debtor presents a very adverse economic situation, so that he cannot afford the installments of his loan in a repeated way, so that the non-payments of the monthly payments accumulate without a hint of being able to revert the situation, the most probable thing is that the financial entity initiates a judicial procedure of mortgage execution, to try to recover the generated debt and the accrued interests.
In such a case, it is necessary to know that our property will not be liable for all the debt generated, but will be liable, at most, for the maximum mortgage liability that has been agreed (articles 12 and 114 of the Mortgage Law), which includes the principal of the loan, the agreed interest, both interest and late payment, as well as the legal costs and expenses of the process.
Thus, with regard to this maximum mortgage liability of the property, it is necessary to point out that with regard to the unpaid interest, both remuneration and late payment, Law 5/2019 establishes limits to the same, so that our property can only be liable for up to 5 years of unpaid interest (art. 114 of the Mortgage Law and 220 of the Mortgage Regulation).
Indeed, if you formalized your mortgage years ago, before the entry into force of Law 5/2019, so that in your mortgage loan contract very high late payment interest rates are established, you can resort to a judicial process to try to have such clause declared null and void, given its abusive nature, that is, that it involves an unreasonable disproportion in favor of the financial institution and to the detriment of the consumer.
In this regard, the doctrine of the Supreme Court on this matter should be taken into account (Judgment 364/2016, of June 3), in which it is established that late payment interest that exceeds the agreed remuneration interest by 2 percentage points will be abusive.
Furthermore, it must be taken into account that if indeed these agreed late payment interests were abusive, they would entail the declaration of nullity of the clause in question, so that they could not be moderated or reduced to a lower figure, but in such case only remuneration interests may be charged, but not late payment interests (which are usually higher and significantly increase the debt with the financial entity).
The early maturity clauses are a series of covenants that are established in the loan contract with mortgage guarantee, by virtue of which, if the circumstances established therein concur, they allow one of the parties (in this case, the financial entity) to terminate the contract, that is, to terminate it before reaching the initially established maturity date, with which the financial entity can demand the repayment of the total outstanding capital before reaching the initially established term of 20, 25, 30 or more years.
"Thus, by way of example, if a 30-year mortgage loan was agreed for an amount of 200,000 euros, but after 5 years the debtor stops paying his installments, if the established requirements are met, the financial entity may terminate the contract and demand at that moment, that is, after only 5 years, the return of the entire outstanding debt, that is, for example, 180,000 euros".
Of all the most common early maturity clauses, the most relevant is undoubtedly that of non-payment of the debt. Thus, if the debtor of the mortgage loan accumulates a series of non-payments in his monthly installments, at a certain point, the financial entity will have the capacity to terminate the contract unilaterally, that is, to determine that the contract is terminated and, therefore, to claim the early fulfillment of the obligation, which implies that the debtor must return all the outstanding capital at that moment or, otherwise, the financial entity will initiate the foreclosure procedure to force the sale at auction of the property and thus recover part or all of the existing debt.
In accordance with current legislation, i.e., Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating the consumer credit contract, when applicable, i.e., for loans entered into between consumers, as debtors, and professionals as creditors, for the acquisition of residential housing, the financial institution may only agree to the maturity of the loan when a situation of default occurs, i.e., non-payment of a portion of the loan principal or interest, which reaches the following thresholds:
In accordance with current regulations, that is, Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating the consumer credit contract, when applicable, that is, for loans entered into between consumers, as debtors, and professionals as creditors, for the acquisition of residential housing, if as a debtor I already owe a large amount of money, if the requirements for declaring the early maturity of the loan are fulfilled, the financial entity has to require me to pay one last time, granting me a payment term of one month, with the warning that if I do not pay all the unpaid debt, then the claim of the total debt of the loan may be agreed.
The answer to this question can only be negative, because in accordance with the current legislation, that is, Law 5/2019, of March 15, 2009, regulating the consumer credit contract, when it is applicable, that is, for loans entered into between consumers, as debtors, and professionals as creditors, for the acquisition of residential housing, the rules governing early maturity are mandatory or ius cogens, which do not allow any agreement to the contrary.
Therefore, if the parties agree on terms of early maturity for non-payment that are more detrimental to the debtor than those established by law, such clauses may be declared null and void by the courts and, therefore, have no effect whatsoever.
The answer to this question is undoubtedly complex, but from my personal experience as a Notary, the recommendation is that, from the first moment, the mortgagor should go to his financial institution to expose the situation and try to find a temporary solution.
So, if indeed, as mortgagors we are going through a bad economic situation that will prevent us from paying our monthly mortgage payment, the most reasonable thing to do is to go as soon as possible to our Bank or Savings Bank to expose the situation, in order to try to find a temporary solution to this situation of economic difficulty, as for example, to negotiate with the entity a period of grace period (of 12 or 24 months) in which only interests are paid, or to negotiate a novation of the loan with extension of the period of payment, this way to reduce the monthly amount of the quotas up to a minor figure that if it is assumable in our economic situation.
In any case, the acceptance of these alternatives will be in the hands of the financial institution, which may sometimes accept them (especially if it foresees that in a reasonable period of time the debtor can reestablish its financial equilibrium) and sometimes not. However, from a perception point of view, it can only be stated that financial institutions are currently more sensitive to seeking alternatives in these cases, so that they are not as inflexible as in the past, when at the slightest non-payment, negotiation was non-existent (bear in mind that at present, banking regulations penalize institutions for any default they may present, so that they try to seek all possible solutions before declaring the early maturity of the debt, as this entails high costs in terms of provisions, with the corresponding impact on results and ratios of capital, solvency, etc.).).
Of course, from my experience as a Notary, this is a very bad solution, because personal loans are short term debts, with much higher installments and much more expensive interest rates.
So, if I ask for a personal loan to pay the debts of the unpaid mortgage, I will enter a spiral of debt, in which I will pay much more expensive interests, I will owe much more money and, in the end, I will not be able to pay neither the mortgage nor the personal loan installments.
Indeed, if there is a non-payment of the loan debt, and it reaches very high levels, such as to declare the early maturity of the obligation, the financial institution will be legally authorized to initiate foreclosure proceedings, i.e., a judicial proceeding that, If there is no remedy, it will end with an auction of my house, which will determine that I will lose ownership in favor of the bidder who offers the highest bid in court or, if no one makes a bid, it will be the financial entity that will end up being awarded the house to pay off the existing debt.
The so-called dation in payment, that is, the possibility of returning the possession and ownership of the property to the financial institution, in payment of the existing debt, unlike what happens in other countries, is not a unilateral power of the debtor contemplated by law, so that in principle, it is not possible to "return the keys to the bank" and settle the existing debt.
However, on certain occasions, it is possible to enter into a negotiation with the bank in which the bank finally accepts the surrender of the property in payment of the existing debt, so that once the ownership of the property is transferred to the bank, the bank will no longer claim anything more for the unpaid debt.
This answer is not so easy, because even though the bank may award my home, the question is not settled. In this sense, it is necessary to take into account that Law 1/2000, of Civil Procedure, which is the rule that regulates foreclosures, establishes a series of award values if there has been no bidder at the auction (see article 671 of the aforementioned law).
Thus, if the adjudication value is higher than the existing debt, the difference must be returned to the debtor, in order to avoid an unjust enrichment of the financial institution. However, this reality is not the norm, but rather it is more normal that there is still outstanding debt beyond the adjudication value of the property.
In these cases, the financial entity will be able to claim the outstanding debt, for which we will have to respond with our own patrimony, since the patrimonial responsibility of the debtor is universal, in accordance with article 1911 of the Civil Code, which implies that this one responds of its debts with all its present and future goods.
Unfortunately, if the foreclosure process actually reaches its final consequences, so that the property is auctioned and awarded to a bidder or, if the bidding is deserted, it is awarded to the mortgagee, in such case the debtor has lost ownership of the property, which determines his obligation to abandon the property.
If, nevertheless, they do not abandon the dwelling, the Civil Proceedings Law establishes that the occupants of the dwelling will be evicted by a judicial procession assisted, if necessary, by the State Security Forces and Corps.
In any case, in order to avoid these dramatic situations, it is recommended that people who find themselves in this situation go as soon as possible to the social services of their municipality or autonomous community, in order to obtain alternative housing assistance.
A loan is a type of contract, entered into between two parties, by virtue of which one of them, called creditor, lends to the other, called debtor, an amount of money, committing the debtor to return that amount of money within a certain period of time, normally through a return spread over time by means of the payment of periodic installments (monthly is the most common) until the return of all the capital loaned is achieved.
Also, since it is an onerous business, the creditor, in exchange for lending money, receives a consideration in the form of an agreed interest rate, so that the debtor, in addition to returning the loaned capital, pays the creditor an interest rate at which the creditor obtains a profit.
A mortgage loan is a type of loan in which, given the usual high amount of the loan, the creditor requires, as an additional guarantee to ensure compliance with the monetary obligation (i.e., to repay the money lent), the constitution of a real right of mortgage on a property owned by the debtor, so that, in the event of non-payment, in addition to the property and assets that the debtor has in its patrimony to pay the debt, the creditor will have the right to request, through the corresponding executive judicial process, the sale of that property in order to, with the money obtained from it in an auction, satisfy the amount of the debt in question.
Thus, in reality, when a mortgage loan is signed, two distinct legal acts are being carried out. In the first place, a loan contract, and in addition a second act, that is, the constitution of a real right in favor of the mortgagee.
In fact, a mortgage loan can be used to finance any desired transaction, from the purchase of a property, or a car, or even to obtain the necessary capital to start a business or to make an investment in an existing one.
In short, the constitution of a real right of mortgage on a property owned by a debtor, as security for a loan transaction, is a resource that can be used to finance any kind of transaction, regardless of the destination of the money lent, if so agreed by the contracting parties.
However, the reality of the market shows us that, given the current high price of housing, most people who are considering the acquisition of a property do so by resorting to credit from a financial institution, and it is in those cases, to ensure compliance with the payment of that debt for the purchase of a home, that the contracting parties resort to the constitution of the real right of mortgage on the property in question, in order to provide greater guarantees for the credit operation, make it viable and thus ensure that the majority of the population has access to a home in property.
Of course, the answer to this question is no, so that, although it is usual for most families to take out a mortgage loan to acquire their first home, or habitual residence, that is, the one in which they usually live most of the year, it is no less true that, if they have sufficient economic capacity, they can take out a mortgage loan to acquire a second home for holiday leisure.
In short, the habitual thing is to contract a mortgage loan to acquire our habitual housing, but if one has sufficient income, and a financial organization grants it to us, there is no impediment whatsoever in contracting a second or ulterior mortgage loan to buy a second residence.
Indeed, taking into account the importance that the acquisition of a primary residence represents for any average family, there is an abundance of regulations that specifically regulate, with a bias towards greater consumer protection, those mortgage loan transactions intended for the acquisition of a residential dwelling, as for example can happen with Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating real estate credit contracts, or in the rules of the Civil Procedure Law relating to mortgage foreclosure, in which greater protection and more advantageous regulation is offered on habitual dwellings than with respect to any other.
Thus, as indicated, depending on the type of contracting parties, i.e., if the debtor is a private individual and the creditor is a professional, or depending on the type of property purchased (for example, if it is a habitual residence or not), the regulations governing the transaction will be one or the other.
In the minutes of the loan with mortgage guarantee, it is necessary that the parties, especially with regard to the mortgaged debtor, that a specific address is fixed, since any kind of reliable notification that the creditor entity must make to the debtor, in relation to any vicissitude that may occur throughout the life of the loan contract, will be made at the same address.
"Thus, for example, if a default occurs and the financial entity has to claim the unsatisfied debt, it may do so by giving reliable notification of the claim for such default at the address fixed by the parties".
In practice, in the majority of transactions, the mortgaged property itself is established as the payment address for notification purposes, unless it is a second residence used for holiday leisure, in which case it can be agreed to establish the debtors' habitual residence as the address for notification purposes.
The associated deposit of a mortgage loan is the bank account in which the debtor will domicile the receipts of the loan, so that, in each period that has been agreed (normally, month to month), the Bank or Savings Bank will send us a receipt to that account to collect the corresponding monthly payment of our mortgage loan.
As an extension, bear in mind that if a mortgage loan is requested in a certain financial entity, the normal and reasonable thing is to have a bank account in the same one, in order to facilitate the payment of these receipts by both parts.
Indeed, it is legal and perfectly possible to constitute a loan in a currency other than the Euro, which is the legal tender in Spain. In this case, both the capital loaned and the installments to be repaid will be indexed to the other currency chosen (such as the US dollar, the Japanese yen, etc.).
Regarding this kind of operations, it is necessary for the consumer to be very aware that they present a high risk, since the existing debt will vary not only according to the money we pay back month by month, but also according to the exchange rate of the currency in question. Thus, if that other currency experiences high appreciations, and our income is in euros, it will be much more expensive for us to have the necessary currencies to pay each monthly installment, so our debt will grow. On the contrary, if the fluctuation were favorable to our interests, in the event of a depreciation of that currency, we would benefit from the operation.
In view of the above, it does not seem reasonable that a private consumer, without extensive knowledge of the functioning of the financial and currency markets and with income in Spain in Euros, should take out a mortgage loan of this nature, since depending on the fluctuation of that currency, he could lose a lot of money, as has already happened in past decades in the Spanish financial sector, in which many people, in order to save money, took out mortgages referenced to the Japanese Yen and lost large amounts of money (we are talking about hundreds of thousands of Euros).
However, if you have extensive knowledge of finance and currency exchange rates, or if you earn income in that currency (for example, someone who collects rents in that country with that currency, or works for a foreign company that pays his salary in that currency), if the market conditions are favorable, it can mean a considerable saving of money.
Indeed, at present, in order to guarantee the solvency and confidence of depositors in the Spanish financial system, the so-called Deposit Guarantee Fund, which is a public credit institution that, fed by the contributions made by the financial institutions themselves, guarantees up to €100,000 per deposit.
Thus, if any person has a bank account with up to €100,000 in a Spanish financial institution, and the latter has a liquidity or solvency problem that makes it impossible to meet the withdrawal requests of its depositors, to the point of bankruptcy of the Bank or Savings Bank, the Deposit Guarantee Fund would come into play, ensuring that individual savers recover their money, up to the aforementioned limit of €100,000.
If we wish to acquire a house, beyond the capital that a financial entity can lend us, we will have to count on previous own funds of, approximately, 32% of the cost of sale of the property, to face, at least, 20% of the price with our savings (which is the minimum that the financial entity will demand from us), 10% of the operation, approximately, to pay the taxes that encumber it, as well as between 1 and 2% additional to cover the expenses of Notary and Registry of the Property.
Thus, by way of example, "if we wish to acquire a house whose sale price is 300,000 euros, that 32% would mean the amount of 96,000 euros; of which 20% will correspond to the part of the price that we will have to pay with our savings (60.000 in the example), 10% to pay the taxes of the operation (approximately 30.000€ in our example) and between 1 and 2% to pay the Notary and Land Registry fees (that is, in our example, a maximum amount of around 6.000€)".
In accordance with the regulations in force, for a mortgage to be validly constituted, it must be registered in the Property Registry, for which it will be necessary that the mortgage has been formalized in a public deed authorized by a Notary Public. Thus, effectively, in order to be able to have access to our loan with mortgage guarantee, it will be necessary to formalize the operation in a public deed and, a posteriori, to register the same one in the Registry of the Property.
In any case, all these formalities will usually be carried out by an agency or by the notary's office itself, without the buyer having to worry about carrying out all these bureaucratic acts.
The mortgage is a real right that is constituted on a property (property of the debtor), together with the loan, to guarantee the fulfillment of the main obligation, that is, to repay the money lent. Therefore, if there is a default on the loan, the financial entity, as creditor, may initiate a judicial foreclosure proceeding in order to have the property auctioned so that, with the money obtained from the best bid, it can recover the money loaned and the interest accrued, as well as the expenses and costs generated by the judicial proceeding.
The acquisition of a property, in principle, can be formalized in a private document signed between buyer and seller in which all the clauses of the contract in question are included.
However, this practice, at the present time, is practically banished from the reality of the economic traffic, since to assure the legality of the contract, as well as the legal security of all the parts, the most advisable thing is to formalize this transaction of sale and purchase before a Notary Public, since this one, as a public official expert in private law, will watch over the verification of the identity of the contracting parties, the assurance of the ownership of the property to be transferred, as well as the legality of all the clauses and stipulations agreed upon by the parties, which undoubtedly offers the peace of mind that the legal business that is being celebrated, which is of crucial importance in the life of any person, is carried out in an unpolluted manner and without any risk for any of the contracting parties.
Thus, if this is the case with regard to the contract of sale of the property, the question becomes even more important in the event that for the acquisition of the property a loan must be taken out with a financial entity, since the same, in order to guarantee the payment of the debt that is contracted, will require the constitution of a mortgage on the property in question, for which, as a formal requirement, the granting of a public deed will be required, since this is required by article 145 of the Mortgage Law.
Indeed, in addition to the formal requirement to convey the mortgage through a public deed authorized by a Notary Public, it is necessary that the mortgage be registered in the Land Registry where the property is registered, as required by the applicable regulations, such as article 1875 of the Civil Code or article 145 of the Mortgage Law.
This will ensure that our mortgage is perfectly validated by two public officials specialized in preventive legal security (i.e., the Notary of the transaction and the Property Registrar), thus ensuring that the mortgage real right complies with all the requirements and guarantees of the current regulations.
The Land Registry is a public institution whose purpose is the registration or annotation of acts and contracts relating to ownership and other rights in rem over real estate.
Thus, the Land Registry is an instrument that provides legal certainty and publicity to the real estate market, since all the properties in a given territorial area are registered in it, with a description of their location, size and characteristics, as well as, what is more important and interesting, their owners and the rights or encumbrances that may weigh on those properties.
The granting of public instruments before a Notary Public, as well as their registration in the Land Registry, are subject to a cost, which is determined and prefixed by an official regulation, in which, through a tariff, the fees to be charged by Notaries and Registrars are fixed, depending on several variables, such as the amount of the transaction, the extension of the document, etc.
In any case, bear in mind that since the entry into force of Law 5/2019, of March 15, 2009, regulating the real estate loan contract, the financial entity must be the one to bear the cost of the granting of the mortgage loan deed, as well as its registration in the Property Registry, since it is the interested party in the constitution of said guarantee.
However, the interested party must understand that this price transfer may be fictitious, because although the law so establishes, it is reasonable that the banks, depending on their marking power, end up transferring this cost to their client through an increase in the interest rate applicable to the operations.
The Land Registry is a public institution whose purpose is the registration or annotation of acts and contracts relating to ownership and other rights in rem over real estate.
Thus, the Land Registry is an instrument that provides legal certainty and publicity to the real estate market, since it records all the properties in a given territorial area, with a description of their location, size and characteristics, as well as, most importantly and interestingly, their owners and the rights or encumbrances that may weigh on those properties.
Therefore, if we want to buy a property, the Land Registry will help us to know the real size of that property and its characteristics, as well as who are its owners and the possible encumbrances that may have that property. With all this information, we will be able to know the reality of that property, who are its owners and what is its real value, taking into account the charges or encumbrances that can damage or limit the use or enjoyment of that property.
The Cadastre is a public registry, of an administrative nature, dependent on the Ministry of Finance, in which rural and urban real estate is graphically described.
Thus, the cadastral registry contains a description of each property, with details of its physical, economic and legal characteristics, including its location and cadastral reference, its surface area, its use or destination, the quality of its buildings, its graphic representation or its market reference value.
Since 2015, with a legislative reform, there is a system of coordination between the Real Estate Cadastre and the Land Registry, so that, gradually, the Land Registry will incorporate the graphic description of the registered properties, with their georeferencing, using as a basis the registry mapping.
With this innovation, all legal operators will see an increase in the legal security of the real estate market, since by consulting the Land Registry it will also be possible to know the location of the property and its delimitation.
If I am thinking of buying a property, and I begin to negotiate with the seller, the reasonable thing is, in the first place, to make sure that the person with whom we are negotiating is the real owner of that property.
To get this information quickly and safely, we simply request a simple note to the Land Registry where the property is registered. With it we will obtain, in a very fast way (in the same day, or the following working day), to know the description of the property, who are the real owners, as well as the charges or encumbrances that could weigh on the property, and all this for a very reduced price, since the simple notes cost a few Euros.
In any case, it is necessary to know that the simple note only has informative effects.
A registry certification is a document issued by the Property Registrar certifying the description of a property, its ownership and encumbrances.
Unlike the simple note, which only has informative effects, the registry certification enjoys the registry public faith and makes proof of its content in front of third parties, with which, if it is desired to obtain this information to contribute it to some judicial process or administrative procedure, the registry certification would be the most suitable instrument.
In any case, from an economic point of view, the registry certification has a higher price than the simple note.
The description of the property is the information that we will be able to find registered in the Property Registry in which the characteristics of the property in question are detailed, such as its physical situation, the data relative to its nature, its boundaries or its surface.
By extension of the mortgage guarantee we must understand a set of additional guarantees that the Mortgage Law grants to the creditor of the secured loan, so that, in the event of such cases, the fact that there is a mortgage on the property will also affect those supervening situations that, eventually, increase the value of the property or are susceptible to an additional economic valuation.
Pursuant to articles 109 et seq. and the best doctrine in this regard, there are three main types of extensions of mortgage collateral, namely:
The natural extension of the mortgage includes a set of situations in which there are modifications in the state of the property or in the patrimony of its owner, by reason of that same property, which are also affected to the fulfillment of the principal obligation. Thus, we can highlight, among others:
The conventional extension of the mortgage guarantee, provided for in Article 111 of the Mortgage Law, establishes that unless otherwise agreed, it does not extend to:
Therefore, as mentioned above, in principle, the mortgage guarantee does not extend to all these concepts, but if expressly agreed, this would be possible.
This legal provision emanating from Article 112 of the Mortgage Law implies that, in the event that the property passes into the hands of a third party owner, the mortgage guarantee will not extend to the personal property permanently placed in the buildings by the third party, nor to the improvements that do not consist of repair, safety or transformation works, provided that all of them have been paid for by the new owner.
"Thus, by way of example, if the new owner of the property were to install in the same a removable swimming pool, if the property were to be executed, the same would remain the property of this third party, since the mortgage guarantee would not extend to it".
In principle, if as a result of a supervening situation that worsens our economic capacity, which causes our impossibility to meet the monthly payments of our mortgage loan, we can find ourselves before a problem of very considerable dimensions, because if we are not able to redirect the situation, so that several unpaid installments accumulate, until reaching certain amounts, this can lead to a judicial process in which the auction of our house will be substantiated in order to obtain funds with which the bank or savings bank can collect its credit.
The answer to this question is negative, since for the so-called early maturity of the mortgage to occur, that is, the ability of the debtor to declare the early termination of the contract upon the debtor's default, which will allow him to claim the entire outstanding debt, does not occur with the non-payment of one or two installments, but the amount of these must already be quite high, representing several installments of a total high amount, which are fixed by law.
In accordance with current legislation, i.e., Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating the consumer credit contract, when applicable, i.e., for loans entered into between consumers, as debtors, and professionals as creditors, for the acquisition of residential housing, the financial institution may only agree to the maturity of the loan when a situation of default occurs, i.e., non-payment of a portion of the loan principal or interest, which reaches the following thresholds:
In such case, the totality of the existing debt, together with the interest accrued, will be due and payable, and in order to comply with such enforceability, the financial entity will initiate the corresponding foreclosure proceeding, that is, a judicial proceeding whose purpose will be to obtain the auction of the property in order to be able to repay the existing debt with our Bank or Savings Bank with the money obtained therefrom.
The foreclosure proceeding is a judicial process, regulated by Law 1/2000, of January 7, 2000, on Civil Procedure, whose purpose is to enforce the enforcement of debts secured by a real right of mortgage.
This judicial procedure, which will be carried out before the Court of First Instance of the place where the property is located, is characterized, as its name indicates, by its executive nature, which implies that it is a fast procedure in which the defendant, i.e., the debtor, does not have the time to file the claim, This means that the defendant, i.e. the debtor, does not have much leeway to present serious allegations, since the grounds for challenge are limited and very restricted by law, so that, in short, the debtor has very few legal instruments to paralyze the process or to discuss whether or not it is appropriate.
Thus, once the corresponding executive lawsuit has been filed, the Judge will proceed to request payment from the debtor, giving the debtor a new opportunity to pay the existing debt and thus finalize the process. If this summons is not complied with, the Judge will request from the Land Registry a certificate of ownership and charges to verify the veracity of the mortgage and all its details, after which, if the debtor has not paid the debt, it will proceed to the auction of the same through an electronic system managed by the State Agency of the Official State Gazette.
If in such auction there are bids that reach the minimum values established by Law, the property will be awarded to the highest bidder, who, if he pays the price offered, will be awarded the auction and, therefore, the ownership of the property. If, on the other hand, there is no bid for the property in the auction, if the creditor so desires, the ownership of the property may be awarded, for a certain value fixed by law, in satisfaction of the unpaid debt.
In accordance with the provisions of article 682 of the Civil Procedure Law, the value of the property, for the purposes of constituting the rate of the auction, will be determined by the value that the interested parties have given to the same, for these purposes, in the deed of constitution of the mortgage.
However, this value may not be less than 75% of the value indicated in the appraisal made at the time the transaction was granted, in accordance with the provisions of Law 2/1982, of March 25, regulating the Mortgage Market.
On the day set for this purpose, the auction shall be held, after which, if bids equal to or greater than 70% of the value at which it was put up for auction have been offered, the property shall be awarded to the highest bidder who has made a bid greater than the value indicated.
If, on the contrary, there are bids but none of them is for an amount higher than 70% of the value for which it was put up for auction, the following procedure shall be followed:
If after the auction no bid has been received, in accordance with the rules of the Civil Procedure Law, after 20 days, the creditor may request the adjudication of the property (i.e., that the bank or savings bank will keep the apartment) for an amount equivalent to 50% of the value for which the property would have been put up for auction.
However, if the property is the debtor's habitual residence, this percentage will be increased to 70%, which means that the debt settled with this award will be higher, which obviously benefits the debtor.
Indeed, once the property has been awarded to the highest bidder in the auction or to the mortgagee, the latter may request the Court to release the occupants of the property, if any, so that on the appointed day, a judicial committee will go to the home to take possession of the property (if necessary, assisted by the public force), after which the property will be delivered to the new owner.
This will depend. If after the adjudication of the property, taking into account the value of the property, it is sufficient to cover the existing debt, it will not be necessary to pay anything more to the bank. On the contrary, if even after the adjudication of the property, the adjudication value does not cover the total amount of the debt (which happens in the majority of occasions), the debtor will continue owing that difference, which the bank will be able to claim, since the debts are universal and any subject responds of them with all his present and future patrimony.
Of course, the dation in payment is not an obligatory figure for the creditor entities. However, if we cannot pay our mortgage, and we negotiate with the bank a dation in payment, that is, the delivery of the house in exchange for paying off the entire debt, it may be a good option, since going to foreclosure proceedings may cause the debt to grow to amounts that determine that, even with the auction or adjudication to the creditor of the property, it is not enough to pay off the entire debt, so that we lose our home and still have to continue paying a loan on a house that no longer belongs to us and therefore we cannot use it.
Extrajudicial sale of a mortgaged property is understood to be the procedure by virtue of which, in the event of default on the mortgage loan, the enforcement of the guarantee, that is, the attempt to sell the mortgaged property to obtain the funds necessary to pay off the debt, is not carried out through a judicial proceeding, but through a different sale procedure, which will be carried out before a Notary Public.
In the event of non-payment of the loan secured by the real right of mortgage, this procedure may only be used to try to auction the mortgaged property, when this has been expressly agreed in the deed of constitution of the mortgage in question.
On the other hand, if this has not been expressly agreed, the creditor must resort to the corresponding judicial foreclosure proceeding.
In order for the agreement reached to resort to this extrajudicial sale procedure, in case of default, to be valid, a series of requirements must be met, the most relevant of which are the following:
If there is indeed a non-payment of the secured debt, and this procedure has been agreed in the deed of incorporation, the creditor will send a request to a Notary Public (who must be from the place where the property is located) to initiate this procedure, stating the details of the non-payment, together with the corresponding registered mortgage deed.
Verified the concurrence of all the documentation, the Notary in question will communicate this circumstance to the debtor so that, in a determined term, he pays the existing debt (thus giving him an opportunity to pay what is due and avoid losing his house).
Once the period granted has elapsed without the requirement being complied with, the auction of the property will be held, which will currently be carried out only once, electronically, through the auction portal of the State Agency of the Official State Gazette. In the same, all the bids of the bidders that meet the legally established requirements will be admitted, awarding the auction to the highest bidder (that is, declaring the highest bidder the "winner" of the auction) and, if he pays the amount in question, the property will be awarded, while if there is no bidder, the same will be awarded to the mortgagee for the value that has been set.
Of course, and in order to avoid abuses that may be exercised by professional creditors over consumer debtors, the law establishes a series of precautions or protections that may protect the consumer in the event that the conditions established for the extrajudicial sale are abusive.
Thus, if the Notary in question considers that any of the clauses of this stipulation is abusive, the law obliges him to inform the debtor, so that the latter may adopt the decisions that best protect his rights. If as a result of this communication, the debtor considers that the clause is abusive and files a legal action in this sense, the procedure of notarial auction will be suspended until the issue is substantiated, firmly, in said legal procedure.
The guarantor or surety of a mortgage loan is the person who subsidiarily guarantees the fulfillment of the principal obligation, so that if the principal debtor repays the loan in question, it is the guarantor or surety who must pay the installments of the unpaid loan.
Thus, for example, in the classic case of a parent-child surety, the son acquires a house for himself, as principal debtor, so that it is he who must pay the monthly installments on the loan. However, his parents are included in the operation as guarantors, so that if the son is unable to pay (because he has become unemployed, for example) it will be the parents who will have to assume the payment of this debt.
In general, the need to guarantee a loan transaction with mortgage guarantee will only be necessary when the debtor or debtors present a meager economic capacity in relation to the debt contracted, so that the financial institution, in view of the doubts or misgivings generated by an eventual loss of payment capacity of the debtors, requests the presence of a guarantor as an additional guarantee for the transaction, so that, in the event that this loss of economic capacity actually occurs, which would cause the principal debtor to be unable to repay the debt, The financial institution requests the presence of a guarantor as an additional guarantee for the operation, so that in the event that this loss of economic capacity actually occurs, which would mean that the principal debtor would not be able to repay the debt, there is a third party with sufficient income or assets to guarantee the periodic payment of the debt.
Broadly speaking, we can find total guarantees, which guarantee the totality of the contracted debt and its interests, and also, unlike these, we can also find guarantees for a determined time or amount, so that their liability is limited to an economic figure that is agreed upon or to a specific period of time, so that once this period has elapsed, they would no longer be liable for an eventual non-payment.
The risks of providing a guarantee to a third party are evident, since if the latter does not pay his loan, we will be the ones who will have to do so, when the property of the mortgaged property is not ours, but that of the principal debtor, so that, in short, the guarantor will be paying a mortgage debt on a house that is not his.
Likewise, as the most relevant risk, the guarantor must know that he will be liable for that guaranteed debt with all his assets, so that if he could not pay either, but had goods or assets in his name, the financial entity could attack them, and he could even lose his own home, as has happened on many occasions, generating dramatic situations in which several generations of the same family (children and parents) have all lost the ownership of their home.
The answer to this question must be a resounding "no". The risks of an endorsement operation are very high, as they can put at risk the patrimony of a family, even of several generations of the same. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to flee from this resource and avoid it at all costs, as it can generate very serious and very unpleasant situations for the parties.
In addition to the guarantee, there are other possibilities of constituting additional guarantees, such as, for example, the pledging of assets. Thus, if a mortgagor owns stock market assets, he can pledge these shares in favor of the financial institution in the event of default, so that the latter has an additional guarantee for approving and granting the credit operation.
A power of attorney is a public document in which a person, called the principal, confers on a third party, called the attorney-in-fact, the capacity to represent him/her so that, in his/her name and right, he/she may carry out some legal procedure or business.
Broadly speaking, we can distinguish the so-called general powers of attorney, which are those in which the principal confers on the attorney-in-fact a power of attorney to carry out any kind of legal act or business on his behalf ("such as buying real estate, mortgaging it, accepting an inheritance, carrying out administrative procedures, filing legal actions, etc."). ). These powers of attorney, which entail an obvious power, since a third party is given the power to perform on our behalf any act with a very high economic transcendence, must be granted very restrictively and only in favor of persons in whom we have absolute confidence.
On the contrary, the so-called special powers of attorney are those in which the bundle of powers is limited to a single act or specific business, so that the attorney-in-fact can only perform on our behalf the specific action detailed in the power of attorney, but nothing more.
The proxy clause of a mortgage constitutes an agreement by virtue of which the mortgaged debtor confers a power of attorney in favor of the financial entity that grants the loan, so that the latter can, by itself, rectify or correct the corresponding part of our mortgage, in order to obtain the registration of the mortgage in the Property Registry.
For a real right of mortgage to be validly constituted, it is necessary that it be recorded in the Property Registry, as required by current legislation, and only in this way will the mortgage be protected in the registry against third parties who may wish to attack the property as security for other debts.
Thus, in the notarial and registry practice it can happen that the deed of loan with mortgage guarantee contains small material errors, inaccuracies or inaccurate data that, when noticed by the Registrar of the Property that must register the same, cause a negative qualification of this one, that is to say, a refusal to register this mortgage for precisely containing those inaccuracies or minor stipulations that have generated the impediment.
Therefore, in order to facilitate this process of correction of the error in the deed, a power of attorney is constituted in favor of the creditor entity, so that it, by itself, in the name and on behalf of both parties (that is, debtor and creditor) can grant a deed of rectification or correction to correct these errors and thus obtain the intended registration of the mortgage right in rem.
Of course, this power of attorney is limited to correcting or rectifying material errors that do not have a nuclear transcendence in the contract, but in no case does it enable the financial entity to modify the contract unilaterally, in its favor, affecting fundamental aspects of the contract, such as the amount loaned, the repayment period, the interest rate, etc.
An insurance contract is a legal business in which one party, called the insurer, undertakes to pay a certain amount of money or benefit in favor of the counterparty, called the insured, in the event of the occurrence of an uncertain event.
"Thus, for example, home damage insurance covers risks that may cause destruction or damage to the home, such as a gas explosion that could lead to the ruin of the property".
Indeed, Article 8 of Law 2/1981, of March 25, 1981, regulating the Mortgage Market, establishes that the mortgaged property must be insured against damage for the appraised value.
This ensures that, in the event that the mortgaged property suffers damage, the insurance company will repair it, thus restoring the market value of the collateral, which prevents it from losing value and prevents the financial institution from recovering its debt through the auction of the property in the event of default on the loan, given the loss of value resulting from the damage or impairment.
Likewise, the recent Law 5/2019 of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit contracts, establishes the obligation to take out damage insurance when taking out a mortgage on a real estate property.
The answer in this case is emphatically no, since this is stipulated in article 17 of Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating Real Estate Credit contracts.
So, if we wish, it will be possible to contract this damage insurance with the same entity (through its insurance company), but if, on the contrary, we find another insurance company that offers us similar conditions but with a lower premium, the creditor financial entity will be obliged to accept this insurance to the detriment of its own.
Likewise, the financial entity that grants us the loan will not be able to pass on to us any cost for the expenses incurred in studying the policy we choose.
Strictly speaking, analyzing the current regulations, unlike what happens with damage insurance, it is not compulsory to take out life insurance in order to take out a mortgage.
However, it is no less true that Article 17 of Law 5/2019, of March 15, regulating Real Estate Credit Contracts (applicable when the debtor is a consumer, the creditor is a professional, and the loan is for the acquisition of a residential dwelling) establishes that financial institutions may make the granting of the mortgage loan conditional upon the debtor taking out life insurance. In such a case, the debtor may choose between taking out such insurance with the insurance company of the financial entity itself, or if a better offer is found in another competing insurance company, opt for the same.
In any case, it is considered very convenient to have a life insurance for these occasions, because in case of death of the main debtor, if it is not available, the debt contracted will be transferred to his heirs, who, if they do not have sufficient economic capacity ("as for example can happen if a father of a family with minor children dies"), can be thrown into a very delicate economic situation.
In addition to the damage insurance and life insurance, there are now insurance companies that insure the temporary payment of the debt in the event that the debtor finds himself in a situation of unemployment.
Thus, if the debtor is able to meet his mortgage payment without any problems, but suddenly loses his job and, having no income, can no longer meet the monthly payment of his loan, in such a case the insurance company would come into play, paying the corresponding installments, up to the amount or time limit agreed in the insurance contract.
This, not being a very common option, may be interesting for people who have a high monthly mortgage loan payment and little equity or savings, so that in a sudden situation of unemployment they may have severe difficulties to meet the payment of their loan installments.
Of course, the fact that there is a mortgage on a property does not in any way prevent its owners from selling it. Therefore, if they put the property on the market and find a buyer, there will be no problem in making the sale.
In the event that the mortgaged property is sold, it is normal that, in the same act of the sale, if the buyer has the necessary funds to do so, he delivers a part of the price to the creditor financial entity to liquidate the pre-existing debt guaranteed with that mortgage, with which the property will be freed of charges, and the problem will be solved.
If I want to buy a house, but I do not have the necessary funds to do so, so I must resort to external financing from a financial institution (i.e., a mortgage loan), but the apartment or house I want to buy already has a previous mortgage from the current owner, I have two great options:
Indeed, in the event of a subrogation of mortgagor, if nothing else is agreed, the conditions of the transaction will remain unchanged, with the only change being that, from now on, the party obliged to pay is no longer the former owner, but the new owners of the property.
Of course, if an agreement is reached between the parties that affects the essential elements of the contract, such as the amount of the loan, the repayment term, the applicable interest rate, etc., there will be no problem in carrying out the subrogation with this change of conditions, but in such case we will be dealing with a subrogation and novation of the mortgage loan, since these two circumstances occur together, that is, the change of the debtor and the modification of the essential conditions of the contract.
By virtue of the transfer of information clause(s), the debtor consents to the creditor communicating the details of the transaction to a series of databases, as well as, in the event of non-payment, communicating the same to databases of unpaid debts so that third parties may become aware of this situation.
The Central Credit Register, commonly known as CIRBE, is a Bank of Spain database that collects information on loans, guarantees and other current risks that financial institutions have with their customers.
Thus, when a financial entity formalizes a credit operation, it communicates the same (debtor's data, amount, etc.) to CIRBE so that it can be registered therein. By doing so, if a customer requests a credit operation, any entity can consult this database and know, in a real way, what previous debts that person has with other credit institutions, which will allow it to adequately assess the viability of the operation.
Therefore, this transfer of personal data from banks to CIRBE can only be carried out if the debtor party has consented to it in the corresponding clause on the transfer of information.
Financial institutions can also transfer data on their clients and their transactions to databases specialized in the analysis of credit transactions, in order to build up a data bank with which to analyze the viability of future transactions. In short, at present, with the use of big data techniques, it is possible, by analyzing the behavior of past credit operations, to predict the evolution of future current loan operations, so that this transfer provides the necessary information to those data files with which financial institutions make analysis and study decisions.
In the event of a serious and repeated non-payment of the debtor's obligations, if this has been expressly agreed in the loan contract, the financial institution may communicate the debtor's data to default files ("such as RAI or ASNEF"). Thus, in these cases, the Bank or Savings Bank communicates this default and the debtor's data to the default file, after which they are available to anyone who searches these databases.
Consequently, if the non-payment and the registration in the database of unpaid debts occurs, in the future, when the debtor wants to carry out any new credit operation or contract a service subject to periodic installments that may be subject to non-payment (such as water, electricity, gas, telephone, etc.), these companies, if they carry out a previous search in these files and his name appears, will distrust his payment capacity and will reject the operation or the contracting of the service, with the evident future damage that they generate to that person.
In principle, this is possible, but it is most likely that, in such a case, the financial institution will refuse to sign the transaction, since the transfer of credit transaction data to these databases is a very useful tool for all banks and savings banks in the management and granting of risks.
The enervation of the mortgage is a situation that can occur when the debtor, once the life of the loan has begun, decides to change its operation to another financial entity that offers better conditions. In such a case, the enervation will occur if, after the offer of the other entity, the Bank or Savings Bank that made the initial loan presents a better counteroffer, which prevents the debtor from taking his mortgage to another entity.
To date, this was indeed possible, so that the initial financial institution improved the offer that the competition was making to its client, had the right to retain it and avoid the subrogation of the mortgagee.
However, a recent legislative amendment operated by Law 5/2019 of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit contracts, has completely changed this issue, so that now, in the event that the initial financial institution makes a counteroffer to the debtor, it can be accepted or not voluntarily by the debtor, so that the financial institution has lost the power to unilaterally retain its customer by improving the offer of the competing bank or savings bank.
In the event that the rules of Law 5/2019, of 15 March, regulating real estate credit contracts (i.e., entered into between consumer debtors and professional creditors for the acquisition of residential housing) are applicable, if as a debtor I receive an offer from a bank or savings bank other than my current one, in which the conditions of my mortgage loan are improved, if I accept this offer, this bank will notify this circumstance to my current entity so that it is aware of it.
In view of this notification, my current financial institution must deliver, within 7 calendar days, a certificate stating the outstanding debt, so that the new institution knows for sure what is the amount to be subrogated.
Once the certification has been received, during the following 15 calendar days, the current lender may make a counter-offer to its client, which may or may not be accepted voluntarily by the client. During this 15-day period the creditor may not be subrogated.
Thus, once this 15-day period has elapsed without the acceptance of the counteroffer from our current entity, the novation deed may be formalized, in which it will be sufficient for the new financial entity to state that it has paid to the creditor entity the due amount indicated in the certification delivered.
This is the fee that may be charged by the financial entity that initially granted the loan if, a posteriori, we decide to change bank or savings bank and transfer our loan to another entity that offers us better conditions (whether in terms of interest rate, repayment term, capital granted, etc.).
Of course, this is possible and legal, as long as this commission and its possible amounts have been previously agreed in the loan contract, and all the requirements of transparency and non-abusiveness of the contractual clause in question are met, as well as the maximum limits established by law.
Pursuant to Article 3 of Law 2/1994, in mortgage loan subrogations due to a change of creditor, if the mortgage loan is referenced to a variable rate, the following fees may be charged:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is necessary to take into account that if the subrogation of the creditor implies the substitution of a variable rate for a fixed rate for the remainder of the term of the loan, the legislator has established a special rule, which is as follows:
Unlike the concept of enervation of the mortgage, the enervation of the mortgage action is a very different matter, which will be explained below in order to avoid errors in the interpretation of the clauses of our mortgage.
Thus, by enervation of the mortgage action must be understood that situation foreseen in article 693.3 of Law 1/2000, of Civil Procedure, in which, in the event of non-payment of the loan, and once the foreclosure procedure has been initiated and, therefore, the attempt to auction the property, if, before the closing of the auction, the debtor deposits the amount of the loan, the debtor will be able to pay the amount of the loan, the debtor consigns the exact amount of principal and interest due, the property will be released, that is, the debt will be extinguished and the foreclosure proceedings will be terminated, so that the debtor has a new opportunity to retain ownership of his home.
The protection of individuals in relation to the processing of their personal data is a fundamental right recognized by Article 18 of the Constitution, so that all citizens have the right to the protection of our honor and personal privacy, which is also projected on all our personal data that we provide to any company or professional, when we hire their products or services.
Thus, when we contract a mortgage loan with a financial institution, we provide this multitude of very intimate personal data, such as our ID, address, bank account, data on our income and assets, etc., which, in view of this, obliges these companies to treat such data appropriately to ensure its confidentiality, as well as an appropriate use of the same.
The regulations governing the protection of consumer data, which can be described as very strict, are mainly established in the Organic Law 3/2018 of December 5, 2018, on Personal Data Protection and guarantee of digital rights, as well as its implementing regulations, which establish high administrative penalties in the event of non-compliance or malpractice in the processing of personal customer data.
In the personal data processing clause, the mortgagor freely and voluntarily states that he/she consents to the processing of his/her personal data by the financial institution, so that the latter is authorized to collect, analyze and duly store them in its databases.
Likewise, in this clause, the financial entity complies with the duty of information required by data protection regulations, informing the debtor of how it is going to process his data, what use or destination will be given to them, as well as the identification of the person responsible for processing, that is, the person in charge of ensuring compliance with the law in this matter.
Of course, data protection regulations give the customer or user the right to consult the data available to the companies with which he/she has contracted products or services, in order to know them, as well as, if necessary, request their modification or rectification if they are not correct.
Indeed, if this is agreed in the clause that is signed, it is possible to authorize the financial institution to transfer this data to third parties for statistical purposes, research or even for other commercial campaigns.
An insolvency proceeding is a legal procedure, piloted by a Judge, in which a certain person (whether natural or legal), faced with the impossibility of meeting its obligations (i.e. the impossibility of meeting its debts), resorts to the same to try to reorganize and redirect its financial situation, if possible, so that with a reorganization of the debts its repayment is achieved or, if this is not possible, an orderly liquidation of its assets to ensure that its creditors recover as much of their claims as possible.
Indeed, there is currently a legal mechanism, regulated in Law 25/2015, of July 28, on second chance mechanism, which allows indebted persons in an adverse economic situation that prevents them from facing the payment thereof, to avail themselves of a series of mechanisms to try to rearrange that situation and, even, in the best of cases, to obtain a partial exoneration of the pre-existing debts, thus lightening their financial situation.
In the event that a judicial phase is reached, of course, a Judge will intervene in the same. However, beyond this figure, in every insolvency proceeding the so-called insolvency administrator will intervene, that is, a professional (lawyer or economist) specialized in debt restructuring, who will advise the debtor and will propose to the Judge the most appropriate measures to try to redirect the insolvency situation.
If a person voluntarily declares its insolvency proceedings, this determines the freezing of existing debts and their enforcement procedures, so that individual creditors will not be able to enforce their guarantees separately, but will be subject to the evolution of the insolvency proceedings and the decisions adopted therein.
Thus, in the event that the insolvency proceeding is a suitable instrument to reorganize the debtor's situation, so that an agreement can be approved to guide the orderly repayment of its debts, two mechanisms can be used, broadly speaking, namely:
The so-called bankruptcy clauses in the mortgage loan minutes make it possible to limit the effects that an insolvency proceeding of the principal debtor or of a guarantor may have on the liability of third parties bound by the transaction, so that even if one of them enters into insolvency proceedings, and within said proceeding an insolvency agreement is approved in which the obligation of the insolvent party may be reduced (by means of a waiver or a stay), this will not affect the position of the third party guarantor, so that the latter will continue to be personally liable for the entire principal obligation initially contracted.
"Thus, by way of example, in a mortgage of €200,000 with a principal debtor and a guarantor, if the debtor enters into insolvency proceedings and an agreement is approved in which the debt is reduced by half, i.e., €100.000, so that the debtor would only have to pay back 100.000€, this agreement will not affect the guarantor on the basis of this bankruptcy agreement clause, so that the guarantor will be liable for all the 200.000€ initially requested".
A gestoría is a type of company that employs lawyers and economists specialized in carrying out administrative, legal and tax formalities before any public administration, such as settling taxes, carrying out formalities before the Tax Administration, before Public Registries, etc.
When an agency is involved in our mortgage loan, we ensure that the management of the whole operation is carried out by professionals specialized in the matter, so that the success of the operation will be assured, since they will be in charge of all the pertinent procedures, such as the liquidation of the taxes generated, the inscription of the mortgage in the Registry (including the carrying and withdrawal of the deed to the same), the correction of possible material errors that the document could present, etc.
In accordance with the current Law 5/2019 of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit contracts, when this rule is applicable (i.e., in transactions with a debtor individual consumer, a professional creditor, and intended for the acquisition of residential housing), the administrative costs must be covered by the lender, i.e., the financial institution.
In any case, it is no less true that, taking into account the market power of financial institutions at present, it is quite possible that this cost will be passed on to debtor clients via a price increase in the interest rate.
By virtue of the mortgage management clause, the mortgagor agrees with the creditor to confer the management of the mortgage to a gestoría, that is, those companies specialized in carrying out administrative procedures in the public administrations, so that the designated gestoría will be the authorized operator to settle the taxes of the operation, as well as to manage the registration of the deed in the Land Registry, together with any other supervening circumstance that may occur with the operation.
The clause of information to the debtor is that manifestation that appears in the deed of loan with mortgage guarantee in which the Notary certifies that when granting the corresponding public instrument, all the legal requirements established in the Notarial Regulations and in the Mortgage Legislation have been complied with, with special reference to those figures that protect the consumer, such as the deed granted under Article 15 of Law 5/2019, of March 15, 2009, regulating Real Estate Credit Contracts, thus guaranteeing that the consumer has had all the pre-contractual information and prior notarial advice, which ensures an adequate formation of the debtor's will.
All of the regulations referenced below are consolidated texts (integrating the original wording of the regulation as well as its subsequent amendments). These regulations are listed chronologically and in separate blocks to facilitate your search.
Law 5/2019, of March 15, 2009, regulating real estate credit agreements. (see PDF)
Documentation to be provided:
Documentation to be provided:
In case of acting through a REPRESENTATIVE, it will be essential to provide in addition:
It will be essential to present before a notary: